The myth goes something
like this. When you die, your soul is released from the body and you find
yourself either in heaven or in hell, depending on whether the good you did outweighed the bad and evil in your life. This is the general Western view. People who are more than
nominally Christian say your final destination depends whether you believed the gospel
of Jesus. Believers go to heaven, a
place of reunion with other dead souls, our family and friends; unbelievers are
consigned to purgatory, a kind of time-out, or sent directly to hell, a place of eternal
torture and ultimate destruction. If during
your life you believed the right things about Jesus, you go to heaven the moment
after you die; if you rejected Jesus, you might get a second chance if you're friendly with the Roman Church, or otherwise, you suffer in hell forever, or maybe
you simply cease to exist. Some
Christians, wishing to preserve a place for the Biblical doctrine of resurrection
of the body, believe the believer's soul will be reunited with a resurrected body either
at something called “the Rapture” or at the second coming of Jesus. In the
meantime, we sleep in God’s loving care.
Now, the odd thing is,
there are texts in the Bible that can be used to justify all of these ideas.
So, is the Bible contradicting itself? Can we even know what happens the moment
we die? Did we become believers primarily because we wanted to go to heaven the
moment we die? That was the reason I remember responding to my first altar call
at a youth rally. The evangelist had painted this horrible picture of hell that
awaited the unprepared soul. He told a story of a boy rejecting an altar call
on Sunday and later that week was killed, his life snuffed out before accepting
Christ, and now tortured forever by Satan and his demons in hell. Yikes!! As a 12 year old even I knew I needed my fire insurance. So up
to the altar I went and joined a lot of other teens pleading for God to forgive
their sins and not to kill them.
After nearly 30 years of
ministry and Bible study, learning Hebrew and Greek, schooled in the theology
of the early church and the Reformation, my position was the myth of “soul sleep.”
As recently as a year or two ago, I
would have answered that the moment I die my essential self (soul) is put into
a kind of spiritual holding pattern until the Second Coming of Christ when I am
somehow reconstituted as a new, eternal being in the New Heaven and New Earth. I pointed out the New Testament texts where Jesus said to Jairus that his
daughter wasn’t dead, but only sleeping; or where Paul in his wonderful
description of the resurrection in 1 Corinthians 12 talks about those who are
asleep being awakened by the Lord at his coming.
I call these ideas myths. A myth isn’t necessarily a lie; it is a story told with elements we do
understand to help us explain stuff we don’t understand. Myths are stories in
which values are personified, interact, and spell out moral duty. The problem is we mistake our myths for truth because
we don’t know what we don’t know (better read that last sentence again). We think we know what words mean. We think we
understand the late Bronze Age of King David or the Israelite theocracy of 2000 years ago.
We think we know what time it is. We think we know where we are. We
think we know what happens after death because someone we know saw a deathbed
vision (My great grandfather said he could see the heavenly Jerusalem) or we read a book about coming back from the dead (floating above my corpse, tunnel of
light, reuniting with loved ones, etc. etc.).
For those of us who
accept the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament as the Word of God, we
at least have some touchstones of truth in understanding our life journey. But the fact is: God’s Word on afterlife is a
progressive revelation. That means, for
a reason known only to God, he allowed the cultural beliefs of ancient people to
be recorded as holy writ. The picture of life after death for the vast majority
of Biblical time was the notion of Sheol, a word meaning the pit. Originally
the idea was that a person’s destiny was the hole in the ground. Eternal life was your children taking the
faith of their ancestors into the future. Probably during the Exile (587-520BC) Persian notions of afterlife began to seep into the Hebrew mind and writings.
Sheol became a place of shadowy existence, a kind of eerie ghostly experience. The point is: it's tricky business to proof-text these ideas without a context.
In
Jesus day, people who knew the Bible the best had lots of disagreements about what happened
the moment you die. Sadducees, the ruling elite, held to the ancient idea of no
afterlife. The Pharisees and Essenes believed in a life after death. We don't know the dating of Job, but at least according to the canonical order of things, Job first introduced the notion of resurrection. The prophets developed the idea that there would be a resurrection of the faithful when Israel’s
Messiah would be declared King of the world.
“I know that my Redeemer lives and he will stand upon the
earth at Last. And after my body has decayed, yet in my body** I will see God.” (Job 19:25) (**The Hebrew is muddled here and could be translated "without my body.")
And that brings me to the
problem with Bible translations. Every translation is an interpretation. I don’t mean to sound like an elitist, but if
you cannot read Hebrew or Greek and have no background in those cultures, you
are at the mercy of what translators think a text means. In our email exchange about the meaning of
soul, one fellow copied and pasted a whole list of texts containing the word soul and then proceeded to correct my viewpoint. Of course, what he
did not know (remember, we don’t know what we don’t know) was that there are
different Hebrew words for soul and different ideas of it, depending on when
the text was written. God doesn’t spell out resurrection in the Genesis. But
Bibles have to be sold to people, and while some translators have enough
integrity to provide notes on alternate readings and meanings, not all do.
Here's an example. One of the favorite
Scriptures cited by those who believe the “go-to-heaven-immediately-after-we-die”
myth is Jesus’ word to the thief on the cross, “Today, you will be with me in
Paradise” (Luke 23:43). They lift the word paradise out of any historical context and just assume it means heaven. They also presume that, like our own language, ancient Greek manuscripts had punctuation and don’t realize that ancient texts were just a series of capital letters without even spaces between words. So, the verse could be
just as easily translated: “Jesus said, “Today I assure you, you will be with
me in the pleasure garden (that’s what the Persian word for paradise meant).” Why did Jesus say “paradise” and not heaven?
Translators, marketing to
both students of Scripture and people who know nothing about the ancient world,
try to make sense of texts in light of what most people already think they
know. So, instead of a clumsy concept
like Sheol, the translator uses “hell.” Peter never said Jesus preached to the
souls in hell. The place name is Tarturus.
What in the heck is that? So, if you only read translations of the texts you’re
bound to get confused.
Let's muddy the waters even more. Combine that with the
medieval Catholic Church that bought hook-line-and-sinker into the pagan cosmology
of Greek philosophy. In his treatise De Anima (On the Soul) Aristotle taught
the immortality of the soul as opposed to the mortality of the body. Thomas Aquinas (beatified by the Roman Church) plagiarized Aristotle and in Question
75 of his Summa Theologica made the
pagan idea into Christian orthodoxy. The Roman Church re-defined or re-packaged the Biblical story in this Greek wrapper and firmly implanted the Aristotelian
cosmology in the Western mind. Heaven was up and far away.
Hell was down. Earth was in the middle. Our sojourn on Earth was to determine
where we went the moment we died – up to heaven away from this awful, sinful
world, or down to hell, where we were beyond hope, or maybe to something
called the Pergatorium, the room off to the side of the Roman banquet hall
where you would go and make yourself throw up (purge) so you could come back
and eat some more. Weird, huh?
So, this is is the mishmash we have inherited: a view of the world and our place in it that is completely at odds with how Jesus and his Jewish ancestors thought and spoke. We use the ancient texts but disregard the Aristotelian spectacles through which we read them. Remember when Galileo's telescope led him to state that the sun did not revolve around the earth. The Roman Inquisition found him guilty of heresy and threatened his immortal soul with damnation because the Bible said the sun went around the earth. Galileo recanted, but his insights were true. In our time we are undergoing a radical change in what we know about space and time. The medieval
cosmology not only crumbles but is shown to be a hoax of the first order. Medieval notions of soul, hell, and heaven
will not survive the onslaught of truth as God allows people a deeper look into
the mystery of creation.
Reading Scripture out of context is a pretext for a proof text.
ReplyDelete